Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

First tropical depression of the season may form from 92L
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 3:38 PM GMT on June 13, 2010 +2
An unusually large and well-developed African tropical wave for so early in the season has developed midway between the coast of Africa and South America. The storm was designated Invest 92L by the National Hurricane Center yesterday, and has a good chance of becoming the first tropical depression of the Atlantic hurricane season. Surface winds measured by the 8:23am EDT pass of the European ASCAT satellite revealed that 92L already has a closed surface circulation, though the circulation is large and elongated. Top winds seen by ASCAT were about 25 mph. METEOSAT visible satellite loops show a large and impressive circulation that is steadily consolidating, with spiral bands building inward towards center, and upper-level outflow beginning to be established to the northwest and north.


Figure 1. Morning satellite image of Invest 92L.

Climatology argues against development of 92L, since only one named storm has ever formed between Africa and the Lesser Antilles Islands in the month of June--Tropical Storm Ana of 1979 (Figure 2). However, sea surface temperatures (SSTs) underneath 92L are an extremely high 28 - 30°C, which is warmer than the temperatures reached during the peak of hurricane season last year, in August - September. In fact, with summer not even here, and three more months of heating remaining until we reach peak SSTs in the Atlantic, ocean temperatures across the entire Caribbean and waters between Africa and the Lesser Antilles are about the same as they were during the peak week for water temperatures in 2009 (mid-September.) While 92L will cross over a 1°C cooler patch of water on Monday, the storm will encounter very warm SSTs of 28-29°C again by Tuesday.

The disturbance doesn't have to worry about dry air--Total Precipitable Water (TPW) loops show a very moist plume of air accompanies 92L, and water vapor satellite loops show that the center of 92L is at least 300 - 400 miles from any substantial areas of dry air. The 60-day cycle of enhanced thunderstorm activity called the Madden-Jullian Oscillation is currently favoring upward motion over eastern tropical Atlantic, and this enhanced upward motion helps create stronger updrafts and higher chances of tropical cyclone development.


Figure 2. Tropical Storm Ana of 1979 was the only June named storm on record to form between Africa and the Lesser Antilles Islands.

The forecast for 92L
A major issue for 92L, like it is for most June disturbances, is wind shear. The subtropical jet stream has a branch flowing through the Caribbean and tropical Atlantic north of 10° N that is bringing 20 - 40 knots of wind shear to the region. Our disturbance is currently located at 7°N, well south of this band of high shear, and is only experiencing 5 - 15 knots of shear. This moderate amount of shear should allow for some steady development of 92L over the next few days as it tracks west-northwest at 10 - 15 mph. The National Hurricane Center is giving 92L a medium (30% chance) of developing into a tropical depression by Tuesday morning. Based on visible satellite imagery over the past few hours, I believe this forecast is not aggressive enough, and that 92L has a 50% chance of developing into a tropical depression by Tuesday morning. Another factor holding 92L back is its proximity to the Equator. I would give 92L higher chances of developing if it were not so close to the Equator. The system is organizing at about 7°N latitude, which is so close to the Equator that it cannot leverage the Earth's spin much to help it get spinning. It is quite unusual for a tropical depression to form south of 8°N latitude.

The farther south 92L stays, the better chance it has at survival. With the system's steady west-northwest movement this week, 92L should begin encountering hostile wind shear in excess of 30 knots by Thursday, which should be able to greatly weaken or entirely destroy the storm before it gets to the Lesser Antilles Islands. However, residents of the islands--particularly the northern Lesser Antilles--should follow the progress of 92L closely, and anticipate heavy rains and high winds moving through the islands by Saturday or Sunday next weekend. The GFDL and HWRF models are predicting that 92L will develop into a moderate strength tropical storm that will then be weakened or destroyed by the end of the week, before it reaches the islands. This looks like a reasonable forecast.


Figure 3. The departure of sea surface temperature (SST) from average for June 10, 2010. Image credit: NOAA/NESDIS.

Oil spill wind forecast
There is little change to the oil spill wind forecast for the coming two weeks. Light winds of 5 - 10 knots mostly out of the south or southeast will blow in the northern Gulf of Mexico all week, according to the latest marine forecast from NOAA. These winds will keep oil near the coast of Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, and the extreme western Florida Panhandle, according to the latest trajectory forecasts from NOAA and the State of Louisiana. The long range 8 - 16 day forecast from the GFS model indicates a typical summertime light wind regime, with winds mostly blowing out of the south or southeast. This wind regime will likely keep oil close to the coastal areas that have already seen oil impacts over the past two weeks.

Jeff Masters
Categories: Hurricane
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 901 - 951

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78Blog Index

902. gator23 7:28 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting Baltimorebirds:
Becuase that's what the nhc does.people in the islands need to take watch.

The NHC cant issue warnings for other countries.
Member Since: August 26, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 1994
903. JRRP 7:28 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Member Since: August 16, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 4305
904. reedzone 7:28 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting Levi32:
If we don't get TD #1 at 5pm then I'm not sure what the NHC is looking at.


The NHC likes t see a ball of deep convection on an organized, but ragged invest to name it. Just going by past storms like this. Most likely to happen in the morning.
Member Since: July 1, 2008 Posts: 13 Comments: 7247
905. MiamiHurricanes09 7:29 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting FLWeatherFreak91:
Yes. The NHC will upgrade to TD tomorrow morning and we're likely to have Alex sometime tomorrow afternoon.
Will is a strong word when dealing with the NHC.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
906. MrstormX 7:29 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting Bordonaro:

The Federal Government of the US has major problems.. Meteorologists who work for NOAA/NWS/SPC and NHC are skilled professionals who do an EXCELLENT job. Cut them some slack!!



Yes I back our men and women forecasters fully, there is a reason the government hires them.
Member Since: May 27, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 4228
907. pottery 7:29 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting FLWeatherFreak91:
Because any tropical storm force winds with this system won't reach those islands in the next 48 hours.

Those are not Islands, my friend.
They are Countries in South America.
Member Since: October 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20708
908. wfyweather 7:29 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
who thinks it will be classified at 5?
Member Since: July 12, 2008 Posts: 11 Comments: 422
909. FLWeatherFreak91 7:29 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting gator23:

The NHC cant issue warnings for other countries.
No, but whenever they "recommend" watches and warnings, the countries always follow suit.
Member Since: December 1, 2006 Posts: 2 Comments: 3458
910. Levi32 7:29 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting Weather456:


I forgot to finish with "lol"

Sorry for the confusion


No problem lol....good test for us.
Member Since: November 24, 2005 Posts: 586 Comments: 25443
911. gator23 7:30 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting Bordonaro:

The Federal Government of the US has major problems.. Meteorologists who work for NOAA/NWS/SPC and NHC are skilled professionals who do an EXCELLENT job. Cut them some slack!!


dude, I was agreeing with you 100% I think that our military and our postal service along with our air traffic controllers and our mets ALL do a fantastic job.
Member Since: August 26, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 1994
912. Patrap 7:30 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Member Since: July 3, 2005 Posts: 370 Comments: 111297
913. xcool 7:30 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Member Since: September 26, 2009 Posts: 2 Comments: 15501
914. MiamiHurricanes09 7:30 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting wfyweather:
who thinks it will be classified at 5?
I don't think they will classify it but I think they should.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
915. JRRP 7:30 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting weatherwatcher12:

I think that structure matters more in this case since it does have a moderate amount of convection and it has been persistent.

ok
Member Since: August 16, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 4305
916. Levi32 7:30 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting reedzone:


The NHC likes t see a ball of deep convection on an organized, but ragged invest to name it. Just going by past storms like this. Most likely to happen in the morning.


But again, we don't need a ball. That's 50-knot+ TS-type pattern.
Member Since: November 24, 2005 Posts: 586 Comments: 25443
917. FLWeatherFreak91 7:30 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting MiamiHurricanes09:
Will is a strong word when dealing with the NHC.
Just wait and see then.
Member Since: December 1, 2006 Posts: 2 Comments: 3458
918. Tazmanian 7:30 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
DATE/TIME LAT LON CLASSIFICATION STORM
13/1745 UTC 6.7N 36.1W T1.0/1.0 92L -- Atlantic
Member Since: May 21, 2006 Posts: 5088 Comments: 111338
920. gator23 7:30 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting FLWeatherFreak91:
No, but whenever they "recommend" watches and warnings, the countries always follow suit.

true but its not 5 pm yet.
Member Since: August 26, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 1994
921. Skyepony (Mod) 7:30 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Ran across storm specific info from Windsat..better wind vector views for sure, unfortunately I'm not seeing time stamps at the bottom.. Can someone explain the Brightness temp images, the stoke 1, 2 & so on lost me.

Member Since: August 10, 2005 Posts: 144 Comments: 29283
922. Levi32 7:31 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
We have Dvorak ratings:

Atlantic Ocean Basin: Imagery
DATE/TIME LAT LON CLASSIFICATION STORM
13/1745 UTC 6.7N 36.1W T1.0/1.0 92L
Member Since: November 24, 2005 Posts: 586 Comments: 25443
923. MZV 7:31 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Certainly looks a lot better now than it did 4 hours ago when Dr Masters blogged on it. He thought it looked pretty good for an early season storm even then.

Perhaps we'll see a 2nd update today.
Member Since: July 3, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 227
924. JamesSA 7:31 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Hey, we have something to WATCH! :-)
Member Since: August 17, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 579
925. Tazmanian 7:31 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
DATE/TIME LAT LON CLASSIFICATION STORM
13/1745 UTC 6.7N 36.1W T1.0/1.0 92L -- Atlantic
Member Since: May 21, 2006 Posts: 5088 Comments: 111338
927. cg2916 7:32 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting Tazmanian:
DATE/TIME LAT LON CLASSIFICATION STORM
13/1745 UTC 6.7N 36.1W T1.0/1.0 92L -- Atlantic


Finally some Dvorak. What is the TD threshold?
Member Since: December 21, 2007 Posts: 13 Comments: 2908
928. FLWeatherFreak91 7:32 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting pottery:

Those are not Islands, my friend.
They are Countries in South America.
Yes, my mistake. I didn't even really read the thing thoroughly. Just figured they were talking about the leewards and windwards. Sam answer though.
Member Since: December 1, 2006 Posts: 2 Comments: 3458
929. MiamiHurricanes09 7:32 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting Tazmanian:
DATE/TIME LAT LON CLASSIFICATION STORM
13/1745 UTC 6.7N 36.1W T1.0/1.0 92L -- Atlantic
I can not believe the Dvorak is going to low.
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
930. Hurricanes101 7:32 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting cg2916:


Finally some Dvorak. What is the TD threshold?


1.5
Member Since: March 10, 2010 Posts: 1 Comments: 6902
932. IpswichWeatherCenter 7:32 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting cg2916:


Finally some Dvorak. What is the TD threshold?


Normally 1.5 - 2.0
Member Since: April 27, 2008 Posts: 29 Comments: 2097
933. wfyweather 7:32 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting FLWeatherFreak91:
Just wait and see then.

Thats all we can do
Member Since: July 12, 2008 Posts: 11 Comments: 422
934. 7544 7:32 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting Tazmanian:
DATE/TIME LAT LON CLASSIFICATION STORM
13/1745 UTC 6.7N 36.1W T1.0/1.0 92L -- Atlantic


hmmm correct?
Member Since: May 6, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 5925
935. cg2916 7:32 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting Skyepony:
Ran across storm specific info from Windsat..better wind vector views for sure, unfortunately I'm not seeing time stamps at the bottom.. Can someone explain the Brightness temp images, the stoke 1, 2 & so on lost me.



OK, I have to admit, that is elongated.
Member Since: December 21, 2007 Posts: 13 Comments: 2908
936. gator23 7:32 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting cg2916:


Finally some Dvorak. What is the TD threshold?

1.5 to 2.0
Member Since: August 26, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 1994
937. xcool 7:33 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
WE NEED 1.5 OR 2.0
Member Since: September 26, 2009 Posts: 2 Comments: 15501
938. MrstormX 7:33 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting cg2916:


Finally some Dvorak. What is the TD threshold?


Dvorak huh? Hey Pat doesn't that qualify it for a Tropical cyclone formation alert.
Member Since: May 27, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 4228
940. MiamiHurricanes09 7:33 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting cg2916:


Finally some Dvorak. What is the TD threshold?
1.5 or 2.0
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
941. pottery 7:33 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting FLWeatherFreak91:
Yes, my mistake. I didn't even really read the thing thoroughly. Just figured they were talking about the leewards and windwards. Sam answer though.

No Prob :))
Member Since: October 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 20708
943. reedzone 7:34 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting Levi32:


But again, we don't need a ball. That's 50-knot+ TS-type pattern.


I know, I'm just saying thats what the NHC typically likes to see. Whats ur opinion on the 5-10 knot wind shear north of the islands IF this system survives the band of 30-40 knots.?
Member Since: July 1, 2008 Posts: 13 Comments: 7247
944. Drakoen 7:34 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Doesn't need deep convection. Convection just has to be well organized with a defined low pressure center.
Member Since: October 28, 2006 Posts: 57 Comments: 29010
945. wfyweather 7:34 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting Hurricanes101:


1.5


Well if its 1.5 then we arent far from it.
Member Since: July 12, 2008 Posts: 11 Comments: 422
946. Patrap 7:34 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Member Since: July 3, 2005 Posts: 370 Comments: 111297
947. MiamiHurricanes09 7:34 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting TCHP:
if it can only survive until it reaches the southeast bahamas, then it'll be off to the horses, for sure, right gang? shear-wise, i meant, of course.
Bahamas???? Since when is it going to go to the Bahamas?
Member Since: September 2, 2009 Posts: 129 Comments: 19976
948. Bordonaro 7:34 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Quoting MiamiHurricanes09:
2.0


CI MWS MWS MSLP MSLP Saffir-Simpson
Number (Knots) (MPH) (Atlantic) (NW Pacific) Category
1 25 KTS 29 MPH (Approximate)
1.5 25 KTS 29 MPH
2 30 KTS 35 MPH 1009 mb 1000 mb
2.5 35 KTS 40 MPH 1005 mb 997 mb
3 45 KTS 52 MPH 1000 mb 991 mb
3.5 55 KTS 63 MPH 994 mb 984 mb
4 65 KTS 75 MPH 987 mb 976 mb 1 (64-83 KTS)
4.5 77 KTS 89 MPH 979 mb 966 mb 1 (64-83 KTS); 2 (84-96 KTS)
5 90 KTS 104 MPH 970 mb 954 mb 2 (84-96 KTS); 3 (97-113 KTS)
5.5 102 KTS 117 MPH 960 mb 941 mb 3 (97-113 KTS)
6 115 KTS 132 MPH 948 mb 927 mb 4 (114-135 KTS)
6.5 127 KTS 146 MPH 935 mb 914 mb 4 (114-135 KTS)
7 140 KTS 161 MPH 921 mb 898 mb 5 (136+ KTS)
7.5 155 KTS 178 MPH 906 mb 879 mb 5 (136+ KTS)
8 170 KTS 196 MPH 890 mb 858 mb 5 (136+ KTS)


CI -- Current Intensity
MWS -- Mean Wind Speed
MSLP -- Mean Sea Level Atmospheric Pressure in Millibars
Member Since: August 25, 2009 Posts: 20 Comments: 6785
949. Cavin Rawlins 7:34 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
This appears badly off

Member Since: July 24, 2005 Posts: 407 Comments: 19076
950. gordydunnot 7:34 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Looking at satellite pictures I think the center is a little to broad to give the system depression status. It appears to be anywhere from 7n 34w to 7.7n 36.5w. I think they hold off till center consolidates or they have proof of higher wind speeds.
Member Since: August 18, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 3044
951. CaneWarning 7:34 PM GMT on June 13, 2010    
Dvorak doesn't think this is a TD. Interesting.
Member Since: April 26, 2009 Posts: 3 Comments: 3667

Viewing: 901 - 951

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Community Activity