Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

Hard freeze likely to significantly damage Midwest fruit trees
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 1:13 PM GMT on March 26, 2012 +31
After a week of temperatures in the 70s and 80s last week, it was a rude awakening for Michigan this morning, as temperatures across all but the extreme southern portions of the state dropped below freezing. Tonight, far colder temperatures in the low to mid-20s are expected across the entire state, and frosts and freezes are also expected in all of Ohio, plus portions of Indiana, Kentucky, Wisconsin, West Virginia, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Delaware, North Carolina, Maryland, Washington D.C., and New Jersey. A hard freeze (temperatures below 28°F ) will cause widespread damage to flowering plants fooled into blooming by last week's unprecedented "Summer in March" heat wave. Temperatures as hot as 90° hit Michigan last week, and the National Weather Service in Detroit called the "Summer in March" heat wave "perhaps the most anomalous weather event in Michigan since climate records began 130 years ago."


Figure 1. Frost and freeze advisories (white colors) are posted today for all of Lower Michigan and all of Ohio, plus portions of Indiana, Kentucky, Wisconsin, West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Delaware, North Carolina, Washington D.C., and New Jersey. Although freezing temperatures in the extreme Northeast are also expected, the growing season there has not yet begun, since last week's heat was not long-enough lived in that part of the country. Image taken from wunderground's severe weather map.

Fruit trees at risk
Tonight's hard freeze poses a significant danger to the region's fruit industry, and growers of apples, pears, peaches, nectarines, plums, and cherries are gearing up to battle the freezing temperatures by operating large fans and propane heaters in orchards in an attempts to keep temperatures a few degrees warmer. While freezing temperatures for an extended period will not kill the trees, they will destroy the flowers and fragile buds that are needed to produce fruit later in the year. The situation this week is similar to what occurred in 2007. A warm spell in March that year was followed by cold temperatures in early April that were 10 - 20 degrees below average, bringing killing frosts and freezes to the Midwest and South that caused $2.2 billion in agricultural damage, wiping out apple, peach, winter wheat and alfalfa crops. In an interview with citizensvoice.com, Ian Merwin, Ph.D., a horticulturist who specializes in tree fruit at Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y., said, "I'm pretty sure this will be the earliest bloom, going back at least to the early 1900s. We are definitely in a very risky situation right now for the fruit crop in the whole Northeast."

Jeff Masters
Cherry Blossoms (KEM)
Cherry blossoms in Washington, DC.
Cherry Blossoms
Pretty In Pink (THudgins)
A little hazy today, but still a good day to take in some views of the Apple Blossoms along route 45.
Pretty In Pink
Categories: Winter Weather Heat
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 201 - 251

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12Blog Index

201. TampaSpin 8:51 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
What has the SUN been doing this nearly complete MONTH....It's been very active has it not? The recent Global Warmth HAS BEEN THE SUN!
Member Since: September 2, 2007 Posts: 175 Comments: 19747
202. Jedkins01 8:53 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting ScottLincoln:


Looks similar to what was reported on by the Weather Channel recently. I think they are doing some kind of GIS density analysis of all tornadoes. If similar to what was reported on by TWC, it has no weighting of tornado width, length, or intensity, which kinda makes me wonder if it really is all that great at providing accurate "tornado risk" information to insurers and other interested parties.

Florida might be near the top for number of tornadoes, but tornado intensity averages fairly low for such states. I think a better metric would be a comparison between a GIS analysis of tornado density and a GIS analysis of average tornado intensity, maybe:
Count x Intensity
Maybe long-track tornadoes could also be put onto a point-based-grid such that there are multiple "points" for the tornado tracks if they are not just brief touchdowns. This might help take into account the fact that more people "experience" a tornado when it is long-track versus brief.



I agree on the count X intensity idea for the same reason, but I don't think that should be the only figure being shown. There should be 1 graph for the number of tornadoes, like the one already posted, and then a separate graph for count X intensity. Because you shouldn't discredit number of tornadoes just as you wouldn't want people thinking Florida is "tornado alley" either because it gets a high count of them.


The reason why numbers is still important is that considering I have been a resident in Central Florida for more than 16 years now I have witnessed 3 actual tornadoes with own eyes within this area and even though all 3 were fairly weak they still wreak havoc. I have only witness hail twice, which is kinda funny. Anyways, I remember watching Bay News 9 last year when a tornado which started as a waterspout came onshore as a 110 mph F1 tornado and took the top floor of a beach house and did a path of damage across the county quite close to me. There were people staying in that beach house that were terrified because they said they never thought Florida got tornadoes because its "paradise" and they didn't take the warning serious at all as a result. Thankfully the waterspout as it came on shore created a loud enough roar that sent them headed for a safe spot in the lower floor shortly before the tornado swept the top floor off the house.



If you get what I'm saying here, granted it was an F1 but it still did significant damage enough to potentially be deadly, 2 people were injured from the tornado but not serious from what I remember, I believe they were 2 different people that had their cars thrown around. That being said people coming to Florida or living here should be conscious of the frequency of tornadoes here.
Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5321
203. TropicalAnalystwx13 8:53 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
The GFS continues to show a big outbreak Sunday and on...some of the hodographs it has been putting out are getting just plain ridiculous.
Member Since: July 6, 2010 Posts: 89 Comments: 25173
204. Some1Has2BtheRookie 8:53 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting MAweatherboy1:

I feel like it's me against the blog :P
How does it not become irreversible: We become more energy efficient, use more solar/wind power, less fossil fuels. We use energy efficient lighting. We make better electric cars. Etc, etc, etc. It's not going to happen overnight. But it can happen. And it can stop global warming.


I feel your pain!

I understand that we are coming out with newer technologies now. Actually, these technologies have been around for quite some time. We have improved upon them and are continuing to do so today. But, this is only putting out the match. How far down the chain have the events progressed when we put out the match? ( the reality of the situation is that, at the present, the match is still burning and growing hotter. )

The permafrost is an excellent example to use here. Think of the permafrost as the forest. The permafrost is showing strong indications that it is losing its ability to contain the methane and CO2 that is trapped there. Once this trapped methane and CO2 begins to enter the atmosphere, in sufficient quantities, we have lost the ability to control future events from there. Even by our putting out our match ( completely stop the releasing of CO2 into the atmosphere), the forest will continue to burn (the permafrost will continue to release its trapped methane and CO2). The process would not need any additional release of CO2, by us, to continue the process beyond the CO2 we have released. We have no known way to stop the permafrost from releasing its methane and CO2, once it has begun to do so. The process will continue without us and without regards to anything else we could do.

Striking the match was a tipping point. You can never unstrike that match again. You have introduced a potential, but, by putting out the match you have ended the potential of crossing to the next tipping point. The next tipping point is when the paper catches on fire and this creates another potential. Should you put the paper out and assure that the match is still not burning then you have stopped the process from reaching the next tipping point. You can continue this until the potential for the fire to spread beyond the forest fire has been eliminated. The only way to do this is to put out the forest fire before it could trigger the next tipping point. Each link in the chain that the chain events have surpassed has become more difficult to control from there. You will reach the point that you will no longer be able to break the chain of events.

Each fire becomes hotter than the fire that created it and the added heat brings new materials closer to their flashpoint. Once their flashpoint has been reached they will burst into flames and create even more heat that brings other materials closer to their flashpoints. Any fire fighter knows that once a fire reaches a certain intensity the only thing you can do is to protect the exposures and to let the fire burn itself out. The fire is out of control and is irreversible. The fire will continue until it can no longer sustain itself. Then, and only then, are the firefighters able to step back in to finally bring the fire under control and to extinguish it. With the climate, we are talking about one huge fire with a huge amount of materials to burn.

Please. Tell me you understand now. I am running out of analogies to use.

BTW, the article never said we have reached the final tipping before it all becomes irreversible. The article did strongly suggest that this time is soon approaching.
Member Since: August 24, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 4102
205. goosegirl1 8:54 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
***large majority are going to be exterminated***

They may from hunger, when petroleum based fertizer is no longer available. Or from warfare, when the last few drops of oil become so precious we turn upon ourselves for our own share, only to burn it and curse its scarcity. Or perhaps die from lack of medical care, when plastic syringes and IV lines are no longer available because we believed oil would last forever. This is the fate of the world we love and inhabit, if we can't find a way through the next few decades, but we will die at our own hands.
Member Since: December 17, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 852
206. RitaEvac 8:54 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting RitaEvac:



As for drought and summer heat....

Easy, think about plant nurseries, they have the black netted tarps over the plants mounted by poles, like a deck. Sun still comes thru but not as intense and rain still falls thru. Knocks out the suns heat tremendously, put it over the crop, in fact I don't know why farmers don't do it this way
Member Since: July 14, 2008 Posts: 1 Comments: 8874
207. Jedkins01 9:01 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting LargoFl:
I read this and all i see is increased homeowners issurance premiums even though, ive lived here for almost 30 years and never once saw a tornado



I've lived here for 16 years and seen 3, maybe you don't have your eyes to the skies enough :) I also witness a lot more meteorites than my friends because of my eyes being on the sky from so much storm tracking!


Really though, most people in traditionally tornado alley report never seeing one either. Unfortunately people start ignoring warnings sometimes because they didn't personally see a tornado themselves during a warning so it must have been hyped.


Its similar to how I know many people who aren't concerned with the future of the U.S. only because nothing has happened to them yet. That type of thinking doesn't make any sense and aggravates me greatly but its a common thing in human nature because many people would rather ignore a danger no matter how serious until its too late or almost too late and finally hits home.
Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5321
208. Jedkins01 9:02 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting Neapolitan:
I believe you live in Pinellas County, right? (Correct me if I'm wrong.) The Tornado History Project lists 122 tornadoes in that county between 1950 and 2010, mostly weak ones as you've noted, though on occasion with something stronger:

twister



Very interesting image, yes we get a lot of tornadoes here in Pinellas :)

That 3 marker in north Pinellas is actually very close to where I live, that 1 marker near high point I believe is the one that last year that appeared to be heading right at me but missed to the south, I found clear evidence of the damage path.
Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5321
209. TampaSpin 9:10 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting TropicalAnalystwx13:
The GFS continues to show a big outbreak Sunday and on...some of the hodographs it has been putting out are getting just plain ridiculous.


Looks like Tornado Alley and the Great Lakes areas and slightly further south could be in for this one.
Member Since: September 2, 2007 Posts: 175 Comments: 19747
210. RitaEvac 9:10 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting Jedkins01:



I've lived here for 16 years and seen 3, maybe you don't have your eyes to the skies enough :) I also witness a lot more meteorites than my friends because of my eyes being on the sky from so much storm tracking!


Really though, most people in traditionally tornado alley report never seeing one either. Unfortunately people start ignoring warnings sometimes because they didn't personally see a tornado themselves during a warning so it must have been hyped.


Its similar to how I know many people who aren't concerned with the future of the U.S. only because nothing has happened to them yet. That type of thinking doesn't make any sense and aggravates me greatly but its a common thing in human nature because many people would rather ignore a danger no matter how serious until its too late or almost too late and finally hits home.


Totally off subject, but with turmoil in the middle east, oil there, guy shooting 16 civilians, people hating Obama, young black kid in Florida gets shot and everybody across the nation protesting (like Rodney King) all over again, with elections coming up, Occupy Wall Street thawing out and getting organized for spring and summer, gas prices outta control, storms ravaging areas, earthquakes constantly popping somewhere across the globe, economy on the brink....

The whole friggin planet is ready to explode in utter turmoil and chaos like never before seen. Something is building up and bout to explode seems like by the end of this year
Member Since: July 14, 2008 Posts: 1 Comments: 8874
211. nigel20 9:16 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
NAO forecast

Member Since: November 6, 2010 Posts: 2 Comments: 4510
213. Jedkins01 9:17 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Link

Now here is the big one of Pinellas County, the F4 which killed more than 10 and injured more than 500.


If I am correct under the new EF scale this tornado would actually be an EF5 because its winds I believe were estimated to be greater than 200 mph...


Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5321
214. StormTracker2K 9:22 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting Jedkins01:
a href="" target="_blank">


Now here is the big one of Pinellas County, the F4 which killed more than 10 and injured more than 500.


If I am correct under the new EF scale this tornado would actually be an EF5 because its winds I believe were estimated to be greater than 200 mph...




April 4, 1966 - Pinellas/Hillsborough/Polk/Osceola/Orange/Brevard



The tornado remained on the ground for 90 percent of its life span. 11 fatalities occurred and 300 people received injuries.[10] One or two homes incurred F4 damage in Gibsonia. It is probable that the event constituted a tornado family, and the total path length may have been less than 135.8 miles (218.6 km).[

15 PINELLAS 04/04/1966 0700 Tornado F4 3 80 25.0M 0
16 POLK 04/04/1966 0810 Tornado F4 8 450 25.0M 0
17 OSCEOLA 04/04/1966 0900 Tornado F4 0 0 25.0M 0
Member Since: October 26, 2011 Posts: 0 Comments: 2651
215. RitaEvac 9:24 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting RitaEvac:


Totally off subject, but with turmoil in the middle east, oil there, guy shooting 16 civilians, people hating Obama, young black kid in Florida gets shot and everybody across the nation protesting (like Rodney King) all over again, with elections coming up, Occupy Wall Street thawing out and getting organized for spring and summer, gas prices outta control, storms ravaging areas, earthquakes constantly popping somewhere across the globe, economy on the brink....

The whole friggin planet is ready to explode in utter turmoil and chaos like never before seen. Something is building up and bout to explode seems like by the end of this year


One mega-quake on populated area on west coast, with Tsunami, and a Cat 4-5 cane on the Gulf coast destroying offshore platforms and rigs and hits either Houston or NOLA, gas prices already around $4, and economy hanging on by a thread, it'll be like the end of the world in America, were sitting ducks and we better hope we duck IF or WHEN it happens....then throw all the above in from previous quote.
Member Since: July 14, 2008 Posts: 1 Comments: 8874
216. nigel20 9:29 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting TampaSpin:
For those interested that us my site...i did install a new ChatRoom that works rather well!

Nice website TampaSpin
Member Since: November 6, 2010 Posts: 2 Comments: 4510
217. hurricane23 9:30 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting Tropicsweatherpr:


Among them are four important ones:

African Drought.

Less than average MDR waters.

Good chance of having El Nino. (Although not certain how strong if it comes)

Higher Pressures in most of Atlantic Basin.


To add to that plenty of easterly windshear with the QBO being positive. Also sst's across the tropical atl are running below normal near the african coast.

ECM MSLP
Member Since: May 14, 2006 Posts: 8 Comments: 13274
218. TampaSpin 9:37 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting nigel20:

Nice website TampaSpin


Thanks...i have put a lot of work into it to provide CURRENT info as quick as possible 24/7
Member Since: September 2, 2007 Posts: 175 Comments: 19747
219. Jedkins01 9:48 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting TampaSpin:
What has the SUN been doing this nearly complete MONTH....It's been very active has it not? The recent Global Warmth HAS BEEN THE SUN!



Actually, sun activity has been quite low overall, so you can't really use that against AGW.


The main thing is I don't think we don't really know how much of Climate Change can be blamed on people because from what I see we have a relatively limited period of history to truly observe Climate. Even though there are techniques to have an idea what was going on in the past like ice cores, human beings didn't have a Global network of scientific study with technology throughout most of human history. Furthermore, knowing what the Climate was like with accuracy with pre-human history is even more dicey.That being said, there has been far too much scientific research done on humans affecting Climate to make the Claim the humans aren't contributing at all. Heck you don't even need to know modern science to understand that, it only makes sense humans have to be affecting ecosystems and Climate to some degree.I'm sure some of Climate Change is human caused, even though some here act as if I deny so, but because of our limited period of history of data to work with, I don't think it is sound science to make such claims of certainty as to how Climate Change will continue to evolve. Again, a lot of progress has been made in the field but regardless of the advancement certain claims are being made about Climate Change that I don't think can be true.


Today I'm willing to actually discuss this a little more because the blog seems to be rather civilized on the issue today. I tried bringing up my view on it a few days ago but the replies I received reflected more of an attitude toward my skepticism rather than a desire to show me information on Climate Change, as a result, I refuse to elaborate further with anyone who desires to engage in a biased argument. But if someone is will do so because they feel I'm missing something, that I am actually fine with.I'm not attempting to come up with a counter theory to what is current about AGW. As I stated, I can see how humans do clearly affect the Climate to a degree, but I don't see the claim that we know exactly how much humans have contributed and how exactly the future of Climate Change will evolve.

My skepticism is bred out of how short of period this field of study has existed. Yes I know its been around for a while compared to some fields of study, but to me unlike other sciences, because it is Climate we are talking about here it would have required us to be advanced in the scientific study of Climate Change for the last several thousand years before we started affecting the Climate in order to know what is exactly happening today and what will happen further this Century with good argument.


Like I said, I'm open to anyone who really wants to give me a great answer, just don't throw an angry attack because I'm a skeptic, if you do, I will refuse to discuss it once again because to me then the the discussion becomes futile.
Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5321
221. KEEPEROFTHEGATE (Mod) 9:50 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting RitaEvac:


One mega-quake on populated area on west coast, with Tsunami, and a Cat 4-5 cane on the Gulf coast destroying offshore platforms and rigs and hits either Houston or NOLA, gas prices already around $4, and economy hanging on by a thread, it'll be like the end of the world in America, were sitting ducks and we better hope we duck IF or WHEN it happens....then throw all the above in from previous quote.
rita you are doing it again stop scaring the people we are only here to warn them
Member Since: July 15, 2006 Posts: 143 Comments: 40389
222. Some1Has2BtheRookie 9:54 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting RitaEvac:


Totally off subject, but with turmoil in the middle east, oil there, guy shooting 16 civilians, people hating Obama, young black kid in Florida gets shot and everybody across the nation protesting (like Rodney King) all over again, with elections coming up, Occupy Wall Street thawing out and getting organized for spring and summer, gas prices outta control, storms ravaging areas, earthquakes constantly popping somewhere across the globe, economy on the brink....

The whole friggin planet is ready to explode in utter turmoil and chaos like never before seen. Something is building up and bout to explode seems like by the end of this year


Yes. All of that is happening now. What I see, with how people are treating people and with the difficulty facing us in each day, there were worse times. Much worse times and just from the last century.

WWI
The American Dust Bowl.
The Great Depression.
The biggest of them all, WWII.

All of these things effected the U.S. and our ability to conduct the business of our daily life. The rest of the world was also suffering as much, if not more, than the U.S. was. But, here we are today and, for the most part, we are better off than most were before the end of WWII.

Is the potential here today for the past events to look like a mere blip on a radar screen? Yes, if we act foolishly. ... act foolishly? .... act foolishly?!

OK, you are right! We are DOOMED!
Member Since: August 24, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 4102
223. aspectre 9:58 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
210 RitaEvac: The whole friggin planet is ready to explode in utter turmoil and chaos like never before seen. Something is building up and about to explode seems like by the end of this year

It'd be too anti-climactic for a ReallyBadYear to occur when every prophet wannabe says something awful is gonna happen in 2012. And unlikely when a general wariness pervades society.
It's when the "prophet"s are proclaiming "Eveything is gonna be hunky dory forever!" that ya gotta worry:
Witness the "rah rah rah, sis boom bah" lead-up to the CreditCrunch of 2007.
Or how the feel-good atmosphere created by the success of "Whip Inflation Now" drew in the massive influx of foreign capital that caused the economy to boom... under AdolfHitler.
The same spirit of unbridled optimism about the future caused the idiots in charge to decide that their economies were strong enough to fight and easily win "The War to End All Wars" in 1914.
Member Since: August 21, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 4846
224. TropicalAnalystwx13 9:59 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Picture of the hail here yesterday:

Member Since: July 6, 2010 Posts: 89 Comments: 25173
225. CybrTeddy 9:59 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting Tropicsweatherpr:


Among them are four important ones:

African Drought.

Less than average MDR waters.

Good chance of having El Nino. (Although not certain how strong if it comes)

Higher Pressures in most of Atlantic Basin.


Another factor for not previously mentioned:
Indications of a warm Kelvin Wave moving across the Pacific.
Cold anomalies in SST departures have diminished.



Factors against:
Rising SOI
Cold PDO phase.
High SST's in the GOMEX.
Well above SST anomalies in the Jet Stream.



Based on this, it is now growing more event that a typical El Nino event will infact be gripping the Atlantic this hurricane season. However, here's the key - it's going to occur later than in 2009 and 2006 did, say around mid-season or so, and it will lag somewhat causing a slightly more robust hurricane season than what we saw in 2009 and 2006, so around 12-13 is a fair bet. Overall, we are probably looking at a normal hurricane season, not below (2009) or above (2011, 2010). However, we could for all we know have 9 of those 12 storms hit land.
Member Since: July 8, 2005 Posts: 253 Comments: 20192
226. CybrTeddy 10:02 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
And also, the general public views the last few hurricane seasons since 2008 as inactive, simply based on the fact no major hurricanes have caused mass destruction anywhere in the United States. So, as much as I disagree with that notion - if we where to see a powerful hurricane hit the USA this year, the public will remember 2012 more than 2011, 2010, and certainly 2009.
Member Since: July 8, 2005 Posts: 253 Comments: 20192
227. MAweatherboy1 10:04 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting Cyclone2012:


Adrian, please keep in mind that a less active hurricane season translate to an exponentially HIGHER likelihood of landfalls as a result. Even Levi knows this to be true.

Proof? Logic would say it leads to a lower risk, at least for big storms. Of course, there are exceptions (Andrew)
Member Since: February 11, 2012 Posts: 66 Comments: 6328
228. MAweatherboy1 10:06 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting TampaSpin:
What has the SUN been doing this nearly complete MONTH....It's been very active has it not? The recent Global Warmth HAS BEEN THE SUN!

It sounds like good old 1429 is about to come back into view. 15% chance of X class flare Thursday, 55% chance of M class.
I've found myself really getting into tracking sunspots, solar flares, etc. I'd never really even known about the science of it a few weeks ago. Another thing I've learned from this blog :)
Member Since: February 11, 2012 Posts: 66 Comments: 6328
229. RitaEvac 10:09 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting KEEPEROFTHEGATE:
rita you are doing it again stop scaring the people we are only here to warn them


Fear is the greatest way of warning
Member Since: July 14, 2008 Posts: 1 Comments: 8874
230. aislinnpaps 10:12 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Evening all. Personally, I like when the hurricanes only affect the shipping lanes. For 'most' living through a hurricane isn't the hard part, but it's living H E double hockey stick afterward. The only exception to that in my neck of the woods was Lily who hit in early October and the temperatures were cool.
Member Since: August 22, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 2438
231. ScottLincoln 10:12 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting TampaSpin:
What has the SUN been doing this nearly complete MONTH....It's been very active has it not? The recent Global Warmth HAS BEEN THE SUN!

Ah, it's back from the grave. Or maybe it never totally went there to begin with and is just being rehashed/recycled.

Quoting StormTracker2K:

The tornado remained on the ground for 90 percent of its life span.

LOL

Member Since: September 28, 2002 Posts: 3 Comments: 1483
232. nigel20 10:12 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting CybrTeddy:


Another factor for not previously mentioned:
Indications of a warm Kelvin Wave moving across the Pacific.
Cold anomalies in SST departures have diminished.



Factors against:
Rising SOI
Cold PDO phase.
High SST's in the GOMEX.
Well above SST anomalies in the Jet Stream.



Based on this, it is now growing more event that a typical El Nino event will infact be gripping the Atlantic this hurricane season. However, here's the key - it's going to occur later than in 2009 and 2006 did, say around mid-season or so, and it will lag somewhat causing a slightly more robust hurricane season than what we saw in 2009 and 2006, so around 12-13 is a fair bet. Overall, we are probably looking at a normal hurricane season, not below (2009) or above (2011, 2010). However, we could for all we know have 9 of those 12 storms hit land.

I think that's a fair assessment of what may happen during the coming season
Member Since: November 6, 2010 Posts: 2 Comments: 4510
233. KEEPEROFTHEGATE (Mod) 10:17 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting RitaEvac:


Fear is the greatest way of warning
fear is nothing more but a human emotion with it comes a violent reaction in a last ditch attempt at self preservation
Member Since: July 15, 2006 Posts: 143 Comments: 40389
234. CybrTeddy 10:17 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
CAPE values being predicted by the GFS are very high over Central Texas, with the highest over San Antonio.
Member Since: July 8, 2005 Posts: 253 Comments: 20192
235. TropicalAnalystwx13 10:19 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting CybrTeddy:
CAPE values being predicted by the GFS are very high over Central Texas, with the highest over San Antonio.

There's a strong CAP in place both here and in South Dakota. I highly doubt today is worth a Slight risk. Initiation will start after dark at the earliest.



Member Since: July 6, 2010 Posts: 89 Comments: 25173
238. Chicklit 10:26 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
With 66 more days to June 1st, the official start of hurricane season, I wonder if we'll see anything spin up in May this year.

"CSU's December 2011 discussion was notable in that the forecasting team announced it would no longer attempt quantitative forecasting nearly six months out, noting "...forecasts of the last 20 years have not shown real-time forecast skill." They will, however, release a quantitative forecast for 2012 in April." (from Wikipedia)

The following names will be used for named storms that form in the North Atlantic in 2012...The names not retired from this list will be used again in the 2018 season. This is the same list used in the 2006 season.

Alberto (unused)
Beryl (unused)
Chris (unused)
Debby (unused)
Ernesto (unused)
Florence (unused)
Gordon (unused)
Helene (unused)
Isaac (unused)
Joyce (unused)
Kirk (unused)
Leslie (unused)
Michael (unused)
Nadine (unused)
Oscar (unused)
Patty (unused)
Rafael (unused)
Sandy (unused)
Tony (unused)
Valerie (unused)
William (unused)

Link 2012 Hurricane Season
Member Since: July 11, 2006 Posts: 14 Comments: 10244
239. Tropicsweatherpr 10:27 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting CybrTeddy:


Another factor for not previously mentioned:
Indications of a warm Kelvin Wave moving across the Pacific.
Cold anomalies in SST departures have diminished.



Factors against:
Rising SOI
Cold PDO phase.
High SST's in the GOMEX.
Well above SST anomalies in the Jet Stream.



Based on this, it is now growing more event that a typical El Nino event will infact be gripping the Atlantic this hurricane season. However, here's the key - it's going to occur later than in 2009 and 2006 did, say around mid-season or so, and it will lag somewhat causing a slightly more robust hurricane season than what we saw in 2009 and 2006, so around 12-13 is a fair bet. Overall, we are probably looking at a normal hurricane season, not below (2009) or above (2011, 2010). However, we could for all we know have 9 of those 12 storms hit land.


Good summary there. What we have to look is how will be the pattern of steering for those systems regardless of how many may form.
Member Since: April 29, 2009 Posts: 63 Comments: 8110
240. TropicalAnalystwx13 10:29 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting Cyclone2012:
Latest SST (as of March 26th, 2012) readings continue to reveal a cooling eastern Pacific, BTW, folks.

No EL NINO anytime soon!

No, it does not. Not sure what you're looking at...
Member Since: July 6, 2010 Posts: 89 Comments: 25173
241. TropicalAnalystwx13 10:33 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
It does, however, show some warming in the cool Eastern Atlantic.

March 22, 2012:



March 26, 2012:

Member Since: July 6, 2010 Posts: 89 Comments: 25173
242. CybrTeddy 10:38 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting TropicalAnalystwx13:

There's a strong CAP in place both here and in South Dakota. I highly doubt today is worth a Slight risk. Initiation will start after dark at the earliest.





My mistake - I was referring to Sunday.
Member Since: July 8, 2005 Posts: 253 Comments: 20192
243. PlazaRed 10:38 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
From The privious Blog:-

Why is it that Plaza always goes to bed when I answer him. That is why I dislike talking to Europeans on the blog. They go to bed too early.

1075. Grothar 4:58 AM CEST on March 26, 2012

Right Grother! Where are you now? Its well after midnight here and I supose you are still "having breakfast"!



Member Since: January 21, 2011 Posts: 0 Comments: 1442
244. KEEPEROFTHEGATE (Mod) 10:40 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting Cyclone2012:


Yeah............right! Don't hold your breath! Do you seriously think that we'll see in Apirl what was NEVER witnessed all winter long?

Wake up and smell the coffee, my man, =).

AIN'T HAPPENING!
it will be what it is meant to be
Member Since: July 15, 2006 Posts: 143 Comments: 40389
245. nigel20 10:43 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
West Africa
Link
Member Since: November 6, 2010 Posts: 2 Comments: 4510
246. hydrus 10:45 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting BrickellBreeze:


Thanks,

Hurricane City says South Florida gets hit or brushed every 1.97 years.

Its been 6/7 years.

Statistics are only numbers that have no control over actual events... Everyone here knows that one day, Florida will get whacked with a major hurricane.
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 14246
249. Patrap 10:50 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    



Magnitude 4.9 - KEPULAUAN TALAUD, INDONESIA
2012 March 26 22:21:06 UTC



Earthquake Details

This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.

Magnitude 4.9

Date-Time
Monday, March 26, 2012 at 22:21:06 UTC
Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at 06:21:06 AM at epicenter
Location
4.062°N, 126.418°E
Depth
64.4 km (40.0 miles)
Region
KEPULAUAN TALAUD, INDONESIA
Distances
266 km (166 miles) SSE (149°) from General Santos, Mindanao, Philippines
336 km (208 miles) NNE (31°) from Manado, Sulawesi, Indonesia
347 km (216 miles) SSE (165°) from Davao, Mindanao, Philippines
968 km (601 miles) WSW (248°) from KOROR, Palau
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 22.8 km (14.2 miles); depth +/- 15.6 km (9.7 miles)
Parameters
NST= 34, Nph= 34, Dmin=345.1 km, Rmss=0.97 sec, Gp=119°,
M-type=body wave magnitude (Mb), Version=6
Source
Magnitude: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Location: USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
Event ID
usc0008qnj
Member Since: July 3, 2005 Posts: 370 Comments: 111244
250. nigel20 10:50 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting TropicalAnalystwx13:
It does, however, show some warming in the cool Eastern Atlantic.

March 22, 2012:



March 26, 2012:


Yeah, the SST's have definitely warm...though not significantly
Member Since: November 6, 2010 Posts: 2 Comments: 4510
251. Jedkins01 10:52 PM GMT on March 26, 2012    
Quoting Neapolitan:
From Scientific American this afternoon, this bit of happy news:

Global Warming Close to Becoming Irreversible

"The world is close to reaching tipping points that will make it irreversibly hotter, making this decade critical in efforts to contain global warming, scientists warned on Monday.

Scientific estimates differ but the world's temperature looks set to rise by six degrees Celsius by 2100 if greenhouse gas emissions are allowed to rise uncontrollably.

As emissions grow, scientists say the world is close to reaching thresholds beyond which the effects on the global climate will be irreversible, such as the melting of polar ice sheets and loss of rainforests.

"This is the critical decade. If we don't get the curves turned around this decade we will cross those lines," said Will Steffen, executive director of the Australian National University's climate change institute, speaking at a conference in London.

Despite this sense of urgency, a new global climate treaty forcing the world's biggest polluters, such as the United States and China, to curb emissions will only be agreed on by 2015 - to enter into force in 2020.

"We are on the cusp of some big changes," said Steffen. "We can ... cap temperature rise at two degrees, or cross the threshold beyond which the system shifts to a much hotter state."

TIPPING POINTS

For ice sheets - huge refrigerators that slow down the warming of the planet - the tipping point has probably already been passed, Steffen said. The West Antarctic ice sheet has shrunk over the last decade and the Greenland ice sheet has lost around 200 cubic km (48 cubic miles) a year since the 1990s.

Most climate estimates agree the Amazon rainforest will get drier as the planet warms. Mass tree deaths caused by drought have raised fears it is on the verge of a tipping point, when it will stop absorbing emissions and add to them instead.

Around 1.6 billion tonnes of carbon were lost in 2005 from the rainforest and 2.2 billion tonnes in 2010, which has undone about 10 years of carbon sink activity, Steffen said.

One of the most worrying and unknown thresholds is the Siberian permafrost, which stores frozen carbon in the soil away from the atmosphere.

"There is about 1,600 billion tonnes of carbon there - about twice the amount in the atmosphere today - and the northern high latitudes are experiencing the most severe temperature change of any part of the planet," he said.

In a worst case scenario, 30 to 63 billion tonnes of carbon a year could be released by 2040, rising to 232 to 380 billion tonnes by 2100. This compares to around 10 billion tonnes of CO2 released by fossil fuel use each year.

Increased CO2 in the atmosphere has also turned oceans more acidic as they absorb it. In the past 200 years, ocean acidification has happened at a speed not seen for around 60 million years, said Carol Turley at Plymouth Marine Laboratory.

This threatens coral reef development and could lead to the extinction of some species within decades, as well as to an increase in the number of predators.

As leading scientists, policy-makers and environment groups gathered at the "Planet Under Pressure" conference in London, opinions differed on what action to take this decade.

London School of Economics professor Anthony Giddens favors focusing on the fossil fuel industry, seeing as renewables only make up 1 percent of the global energy mix.

"We have enormous inertia within the world economy and should make much more effort to close down coal-fired power stations," he said.

Oil giant Royal Dutch Shell favours working on technologies leading to negative emissions in the long run, like carbon capture on biomass and in land use, said Jeremy Bentham, the firm's vice president of global business environment.

The conference runs through Thursday."







"Increased CO2 in the atmosphere has also turned oceans more acidic as they absorb it. In the past 200 years, ocean acidification has happened at a speed not seen for around 60 million years, said Carol Turley at Plymouth Marine Laboratory."





Like I said, I'm not ignoring the green house effect, but statements like this is what is not sound science to me. How can they claim they know what the acidity of of the ocean was 60 million years ago?



"In a worst case scenario, 30 to 63 billion tonnes of carbon a year could be released by 2040, rising to 232 to 380 billion tonnes by 2100. This compares to around 10 billion tonnes of CO2 released by fossil fuel use each year."



Again, that's pure assumption.




""This is the critical decade. If we don't get the curves turned around this decade we will cross those lines," said Will Steffen, executive director of the Australian National University's climate change institute, speaking at a conference in London."

I don't see any proof in this. Scientific American also posted an article here saying we need a world government:

Link

With that being said, some of you wonder why I'm skeptical of certain aspects on Climate Change, when Scientific American is making such claims that we need a world government. Really? A world government? That idea is about as sensible as "Drill Baby Drill" well, maybe not quite that bad, it sounds like a good idea, but the risks involved are far too big. That is of course unless you really believe in what the claim about now being the tipping point.


I don't see any convincing proof of any of those claims. Again, is there proof Climate Change is real? No doubt, is there proof humans are affecting it? For sure.

Is there proof Climate Change might be at the tipping point of being irreversible and we need to mobilize a world government to enforce drastic world wide change? I'm going to go with a huge no.

Even if it was true, a world government as the solution is senseless anyway.
Member Since: August 21, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 5321

Viewing: 201 - 251

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Community Activity