Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

New NHC revelations; Atlantic tropical update; Hawaii watches Cosme
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 1:47 PM GMT on July 19, 2007 +2
There are no areas of interest to talk about in the tropical Atlantic today, but we will need to watch the waters off the Carolina coast on Saturday when a cold front is expected to push off the coast. The tail end of this front could serve as the focus for development of a tropical disturbance. The UKMET model is forecasting the development of a low pressure system here on Sunday. This low may be an ordinary extratropical storm, though, due to the presence of high wind shear.

Large amounts of dry air and African dust cover the eastern Atlantic, and this dusty air is moving westward towards the Caribbean. Tropical storm development is unlikely in this region for the coming five days. Thereafter, as a major shift in the Northern Hemisphere weather pattern puts a ridge of high pressure in place over the Eastern U.S., the Saharan dust outbreaks may decrease. Additionally, wind shear over the tropical Atlantic is expected to decrease substantially by next week, and chances of tropical storm formation are much higher next week than they were this week.

Hawaii eyes Cosme
Residents of the Hawaiian Islands need to keep an eye on Tropical Depression Cosme, which is headed towards the islands and may impact their weather by Saturday. Cosme is struggling with 10-20 knots of wind shear and ocean temperatures of about 25 degrees C. Satellite imagery of the storm shows that the amount of heavy thunderstorm activity has decreased some this morning, and it is possible that the unfavorable shear and SSTs will kill the depression before it encounters warmer waters and lower shear on Friday. If Cosme does survive the next 24 hours, it could re-intensify to a weak tropical storm and brush the Big Island of Hawaii on Saturday.


Figure 1. Sea Surface temperatures beneath Cosme were about 25 C (78 F), just below the 26 C threshold favorable for tropical cyclones. Cosme will be traversing a region of 24-25 C SSTs through Friday, then SSTs will warm to 25-26 as it approaches the Hawaiian Islands on Saturday.

More on the National Hurricane Center controversy
In an article published in the Houston Chronicle yesterday, senior hurricane specialist James Franklin said that employees of the center were not coerced by NOAA management into signing the July 5 letter of no confidence against director Bill Proenza. This view was echoed by NHC's top administrator in an Orlando Sentinel article. Franklin outlined a variety of reasons why the staff lost confidence in Proenza--Proenza lacked experience in hurricane forecasting and showed little interest in learning the science, ignored his employees to the tune of 2000 unread email from them, and lied to the press about his employees' reaction to his reprimand from NWS chief Mary Glackin.

Also in the Houston Chronicle story is the revelation that Proenza never applied for the position of director of NHC. He was demoted into it, according to Daniel Sobien, president of the National Weather Service Employees Organization. This raises the question, who put Proenza into the job? Why did they do it? Hopefully, this will get answered at today's congressional hearing. The list of people testifying include Bill Proenza; QuikSCAT expert Dr. Robert Atlas; emergency management officials who worked with Proenza; and the head of NOAA, Admiral Lautenbacher. With the exception of Lautenbacher, all these witnesses are likely to be allies of Proenza. Also testifying will be Dr. Jim Turner, deputy director of the federal agency NTIS (National Technical Information Service), who led the inspection team that showed up at NHC without notice on July 2. Dr. Turner's report was scheduled to be completed this Friday, July 20, but is now scheduled to be released to the Congressional panel today. Notably absent from the list of people called to testify is anyone from the National Hurricane Center. Also absent is a QuikSCAT science expert besides Dr. Atlas, who has thus far not addressed in his public comments, that I have seen, the very high uncertainties surrounding the impact of QuikSCAT data on track forecasts of landfalling hurricanes. In fact, in comments published in the Orlando Sentinel, Dr. Atlas claimed that Proenza's statement that loss of the loss of QuikSCAT could reduce the accuracy of hurricane-track forecasts by as much as 16 percent represents "the consensus of the scientific community." Well, that is not the case, as myself and senior hurricane specialists at the National Hurricane Center will attest to. I'll be sure to present a full analysis of the science presented--and the science left unsaid--at today's hearing.

The hearing charter for today's hearing raises these questions:

Why was Proenza chosen to be Director of the highest profiled Center at NOAA?

Beyond the items listed in the Glackin memorandum--which NOAA stresses was not a reprimand document and was not placed in Mr. Proenza's personnel file--are there any other actions that better justify the action to place Proenza on leave?

Why was there such a depth of dissatisfaction over Proenza's focus on a particular satellite?

What is needed to properly equip the Tropical Prediction Center, and are those resources available at this time?

Was the Tropical Prediction Center incapable of carrying out its core task of identifying, tracking and predicting hurricanes before the evaluation team was dispatched by Admiral Lautenbacher?

Jeff Masters
Categories: Politics
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 1151 - 1161

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 — Blog Index

1151. FloridaRick 2:06 PM GMT on July 20, 2007    
"Miss Bennet, we have a government run insurance in Florida (Citizens Insurance) and believe me, you don't want any part of it."

I would like to add that as a Florida Resident with a different Insurance Provider I still pay a surcharge for Citizens Insurance. Why should I have to pay to off-set some one else's cost, mainly the government. This would be the same for any government run business. And if you think they are not out to make money you are mistaken. I work for a State agency that provides services and plans for surplus money coming from those services.
Member Since: July 27, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 18
1153. BahaHurican 2:06 PM GMT on July 20, 2007    
Two things about insurance coverage that struck me from this discussion, and then I'm out:

1. Misinformation can be a killer. If u don't understand the "rules" of insurance coverage or know how to get the best coverage for your insurance dollars, you can be a BIG loser, short and long-term.

2. If insurance companies are not properly regulated by governmental agencies i.e. by law, it seems really easy for them to go from "protectors" to extortionists. YMMV

Have a good day, all. I'm not expecting any rain from the Twave / ULL today; looks like that dance will play out north of Puerto Rico. I'll check in when I get back to see if anything of interest has taken place . . .

Have a great day, ya'll!
Member Since: October 25, 2005 Posts: 19 Comments: 17595
1154. weathers4me 2:07 PM GMT on July 20, 2007    
Same here re the insurance. If you rates have gone up significantly, you need to call your present broker and ask how you can cancel your existing policy because of the increase. They will then shop for a new quote for you. Let them earn your business.
Member Since: May 24, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 112
1155. mgreen91 2:08 PM GMT on July 20, 2007    
Posted By: mgreen91 at 9:08 AM EDT on July 20, 2007.


I’m a CAT adjuster for a major insurance company, your insurance company will not drop you; your premiums will go up.

So instead of THEM dropping YOU, you are forced to cancel your policy.

So people still end up without insurance. I think in the long term a savings plan for hurricane preparation is more effective. Even saving only a few dollars a month out of what you have is better than nothing. If state governments want to "get in on it", they can match or subsidise the savings of the lowest income homeowners. From my perspective, that kind of long-term planning makes more sense. Like social security, only for your house :o).

Be as it may, people who live in hurricane prone area more then likely to file a homeowner’s claim every year. I live in Chicago; I never had to file a claim with my insurance carrier. If a person lives in Miami FL pay $1200 a month for a 2000 sq foot home that’s valued at $300,000.00 and a hurricane happens how an insurance company makes money?
Member Since: August 4, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 290
1156. 900MB 2:08 PM GMT on July 20, 2007    
Area South of Cuba could use some watching, fairly persistant, fairly stationary, has spin and some convection. Over Very warm waters and there is a shear path of least resistance (5-10kts)straight up the Gulf of Mexico towards La.. Convection would have to pick up on the South and East sides of the disturbance. If it developed, steering paths are towards the Yucatan and Western Gulf. I would suggest that it would be slightly East of that path and could have a clear shot through the Channel since storms tend to move where there is less resistance. Of course, that's only if it perks up and turns into something.
Member Since: June 11, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 609
1158. WPBHurricane05 2:13 PM GMT on July 20, 2007    
NEW BLOG
Member Since: July 31, 2006 Posts: 55 Comments: 7896
1159. mgreen91 2:13 PM GMT on July 20, 2007    
Posted By: CJ5 at 9:04 AM CDT on July 20, 2007.

The bottom line is that everyone who lives in an area that is prone to Hurricanes must accept the responsibility. While I think my tax dollars should offer some limited assistance, it is not my responsibility to make sure people are made whole everytime they get into trouble. It doesn't matter if it is coastal or MS flood plain, people continue to rebuild in the same spots and then complain when another disaster strikes. Personal responsibility.
I agree!!
Member Since: August 4, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 290
1160. CapeCoralx3 2:22 PM GMT on July 20, 2007    
Personally, I think insurance companies should reward those of us that actually take the time to prepare their homes for a storm. You would not believe the amount of people who just have the "oh well I have insurance" attitude. I lock my home down like a fortress when a storm is on the way.
Member Since: October 23, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 12

Viewing: 1151 - 1161

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 — Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Local Weather
Scattered Clouds
66 °F
Scattered Clouds
Community Activity